| Commento del 07 marzo 2013 |
| DUlUbX <a href="http://bsbjbyeesybo.com/">bsbjbyeesybo</a> |
| Commento del 04 marzo 2013 |
| SORDiD <a href="http://njbirdveoafj.com/">njbirdveoafj</a> |
| Commento del 03 marzo 2013 |
| Good Evening Attorney Pettit,a0a0 a0 a0 a0 Thank you for this post and for all of your posts. My colleagues and I are very aivteciarppe of your efforts to clarify the confusion inherent in landlord-tenant relationships.a0a0 a0 a0 a0I hope that you can clear up some confusion I have regarding double damages. Is a landlord entitled to double rent as damages for the days a tenant holds over in ADDITION to the monthly rental? Or is the landlord only entitled to collect rent for the days the tenant holds over at double its rate?a0a0a0 a0 a0 a0 a0For example, if a tenant paying $600/mo rent gives a proper notice to move, effective March 31 (the end of the lease term), but does not move out until April 5, is the landlord entitled to April's rent of $600 plus $100 in damages for holding over? Or is the landlord only entitled to to $200 ($20/day doubled x 5 days) for the 5-day holdover?a0a0 a0 a0 a0 a0I'm not sure If my interpretation of Statute 704 that damages and rent are separate is correct. a0Am I correct in thinking that if a tenant is living in an apartment in April, then they owe the full rent for April and double rent for the several days as a penalty for not moving out when they were supposed to? Any thoughts you have on the subject would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.a0Peter B.a0 |
| Commento del 31 luglio 2011 |
| Woot, I will certinaly put this to good use! |
| Commento del 30 luglio 2011 |
| This aritcle keeps it real, no doubt. |